![black gay porn rape black gay porn rape](https://im.indiatimes.in/facebook/2015/Feb/maxresdefault-5_1423117221_1423117227.jpg)
Hellbent on the notion of freedom, and determined to minimise the innate differences between the sexes, such women have arrived at a point where they are not only queasy about using the power of the state to imprison rapists (those who disagree with them on this they call “carceral feminists”, a phrase that is only ever said with a sneer) they remain unwilling even to consider how women might best keep themselves safe, believing that to do so is simply “victim blaming”.
![black gay porn rape black gay porn rape](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZvODIZ3eBv8/maxresdefault.jpg)
It seems to her, as someone who has both talked to victims and run the kind of well-meaning workshops that are meant to reduce sexual violence against women, that 21st-century liberal feminism has backed itself into a corner so far as rape goes. Perry used to work in rape crisis, and it’s this experience – harrowing, but also highly, endlessly bewildering – that is her starting point in The Case Against the Sexual Revolution. All I can tell you is that while most mainstream publishers are seemingly content to publish feminist books that are both fact-free and clotted to the point of unreadability with jargon, her utterly sane and straightforward text comes to us courtesy of Polity, a small academic press. Did Perry, I wonder, struggle to find a home for it? Was her manuscript considered too hot to handle? I don’t know. It is an act of insurrection, its seditiousness born not only of the pieties it is determined to explode, but of the fact that it is also diligently researched and written in plain English. In this cultural moment, The Case Against the Sexual Revolution could hardly be more radical. T he title of Louise Perry’s first book makes it sound almost comically conservative: uh-oh, you think, expecting a manifesto worthy of some latterday Mary Whitehouse or Victoria Gillick.